<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Info Tech Scraps &#187; Applications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.infoscraps.com/tags/applications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.infoscraps.com</link>
	<description>Information Technology at your finger tips...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:24:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Office 2010 Technical Preview</title>
		<link>http://www.infoscraps.com/2009/05/19/microsoft-office-2010-technical-preview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infoscraps.com/2009/05/19/microsoft-office-2010-technical-preview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 11:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Srinivasan A Paul Joseph</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Previews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MS Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical Preview]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infoscraps.com/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft has announced recently that the next major release of their Microsoft Office suite of applications is named 2010 and expected to be released for a Technical Preview (Beta) by July 2009. The last major release MS Office 2007 is actually Version 12. However, the Office 2010 is versioned as 14. This is probably because [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft has announced recently that the next major release of their Microsoft Office suite of applications is named 2010 and expected to be released for a Technical Preview (Beta) by July 2009. The last major release MS Office 2007 is actually Version 12. However, the Office 2010 is versioned as 14. This is probably because of the common belief on number 13.</p>
<p>Microsoft created a website called <a href="http://www.office2010themovie.com/" target="_blank">Office2010themovie.com</a> based on Blockbuster Movie designs.</p>
<p>They mentioned that the Technical Preview will be available to general public until July 2010. However, the Office 2010 Technical Preview applications will start automatically shutting down after 2 hours of use starting from March 2010.</p>
<p>Though the official version of Technical Preview is not expected until July 2009, Torrent sites has already released the version and is quite popular because of the increasing number of downloads.</p>
<p>The major change in the new Office 2010 is that it is available in both 32 bit and 64 bit flavors (something that should&#8217;ve happened long before). The next major thing I noticed is that the design has gone under a major rework based on Office 2007 theme. They also introduced new themes for Office Suites (however, only default theme is available in Technical Preview). The screen shots so far leaked are amazing and I tried the 64 bit version of Office 2010 in my Vista PC and was awesome by its beauty. Major rework has gone on many applications in terms of functionality. The ribbon from Office 2007 is now available in all the applications (Office 2007 does not show ribbon in some applications like Outlook to make them feel compatible with Office 2003). Instead of the round button that showed Start Menu in Office 2007, it is now a rectangle button which shows a different screen for all menu operations and allows you to go back to work area. All office suites are following their official color schemes throughout the Menus. The performance is slow but acceptable due to its beauty. Unusual introduction is Minimize, Close and Cancel links in Splash screens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infoscraps.com/2009/05/19/microsoft-office-2010-technical-preview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pretty good Open Source alternatives for Proprietary Products</title>
		<link>http://www.infoscraps.com/2009/02/19/pretty-good-open-source-alternatives-for-proprietary-products/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infoscraps.com/2009/02/19/pretty-good-open-source-alternatives-for-proprietary-products/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Srinivasan A Paul Joseph</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comparisons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frameworks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDEs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips & Tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infoscraps.com/2009/02/19/pretty-good-open-source-alternatives-for-proprietary-products/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We couldn&#8217;t thank the Open Source Community or Apache and Mozilla for their initiatives on Open Source that helped shape the Software World well enough. Adding up to that gratitude or vast collection of Open Source products that are available as alternatives to Proprietary Products. Also, please do not think Open Source means free software. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We couldn&#8217;t thank the Open Source Community or Apache and Mozilla for their initiatives on Open Source that helped shape the Software World well enough. Adding up to that gratitude or vast collection of Open Source products that are available as alternatives to Proprietary Products. Also, please do not think Open Source means free software. Many People has that misconception by logic. An Open Source can be free to modify but has some fee to use. There are commercial and non-commercial Open Source applications to be precise. Here, I&#8217;m listing some of the very good alternatives that helps you to reduce your cost as well as troubles with a proprietary closed source product.<span id="more-88"></span></p>
<ol>
<li>Microsoft Visual Studio &#8211; <a href="http://www.icsharpcode.net/OpenSource/SD/">SharpDevelop</a>, <a href="http://www.mono-project.com/">MonoDevelop</a></li>
<li>Web Development IDEs &#8211; <a href="http://eclipse.org/">Eclipse</a>, <a href="http://www.aptana.com/">Aptana</a></li>
<li>Microsoft .NET Framework &#8211; <a href="http://www.mono-project.com/">Mono</a></li>
<li>Microsoft SQL Server &#8211; <a href="http://dev.mysql.com/">MySQL</a>, <a href="http://www.postgresql.org/">PostgreSQL</a>, <a href="http://www.firebirdsql.org/">FireBird</a></li>
<li>Microsoft Project &#8211; <a href="http://openproj.org/openproj">OpenProj</a>, <a href="http://www.openworkbench.org/">Open Workbench</a></li>
<li>Microsoft Visio &#8211; <a href="http://live.gnome.org/Dia">Dia</a>, <a href="http://staruml.sourceforge.net/en/">StarUML</a></li>
<li>Microsoft Publisher &#8211; <a href="http://www.scribus.net/">Scribus</a></li>
<li>Microsoft Office &#8211; <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/">OpenOffice</a></li>
<li>Microsoft Office Outlook/Outlook Express &#8211; <a href="http://projects.gnome.org/evolution/">Evolution</a> / <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/thunderbird/">Mozilla Thunderbird</a></li>
<li>Microsoft Exchange Server &#8211; <a href="http://www.zimbra.com/community/">Zimbra</a>, <a href="http://www.open-xchange.com/en/oxpedia">OpenXchange</a></li>
<li>Microsoft SharePoint &#8211; <a href="http://www.alfresco.com/">Alfresco</a>, <a href="http://wiki.mindtouch.com/">Deki Wiki</a>, <a href="http://www.dotnetnuke.com/">DotNetNuke</a>, <a href="http://phpnuke.org/">PHPNuke</a></li>
<li>Mercury LoadRunner &#8211; <a href="http://www.opensta.org/">OpenSTA</a></li>
<li>Adobe Flash &#8211; <a href="http://www.openlaszlo.org/">OpenLaszlo</a></li>
<li>Adobe Acrobat &#8211; <a href="http://www.pdfforge.org/products/pdfcreator">PDFCreator</a></li>
<li>Adobe Photoshop &#8211; <a href="http://www.getpaint.net/">Paint.NET</a>, <a href="http://www.cinepaint.org/">CinePaint</a>, <a href="http://www.gimp.org/">GIMP</a>, <a href="http://plasticbugs.com/?page_id=294">GIMPShop</a></li>
<li>Adobe Illustrator &#8211; <a href="http://www.inkscape.org/">Inkspace</a></li>
<li>Adobe Premier/After Effects &#8211; <a href="http://avidemux.sourceforge.net/">Avidemux</a> / <a href="http://jahshaka.org/">Jahshaka</a></li>
<li>BusinessObjects Crystal Reports &#8211; <a href="http://www.jasperforge.org/jaspersoft/opensource/business_intelligence/jasperreports/">JasperReports</a>, <a href="http://datavision.sourceforge.net/">DataVision</a>, <a href="http://www.xtuple.com/openrpt/">OpenRPT</a></li>
<li>Microsoft Dynamics &#8211; <a href="http://www.sugarforge.org/content/open-source/">SugarCRM</a></li>
<li>Microsoft Money / Quicken &#8211; <a href="http://www.gnucash.org/">GNUCash</a>, <a href="http://www.grisbi.org/">Grisbi</a></li>
<li>MindManager &#8211; <a href="http://freemind.sourceforge.net/">FreeMind</a></li>
<li>WinZip &#8211; <a href="http://www.7-zip.org/">7zip</a></li>
<li>Beyond Compare (File/Directory) Comparison &#8211; <a href="http://winmerge.org/">WinMerge</a></li>
<li>CodeSmith (Easy Code Generator) &#8211; <a href="http://www.mygenerationsoftware.com/portal/default.aspx">MyGeneration</a></li>
<li>Icon Editor &#8211; <a href="http://icofx.ro/">IcoFX</a></li>
<li>FTP Client &#8211; <a href="http://filezilla-project.org/">FileZilla</a></li>
</ol>
<p>There are much more than this list is available. But this is a start to remove on famous proprietary software from your arsenal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infoscraps.com/2009/02/19/pretty-good-open-source-alternatives-for-proprietary-products/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A better alternative to Microsoft Visual Studio from Open Source community</title>
		<link>http://www.infoscraps.com/2009/02/09/a-better-alternative-to-microsoft-visual-studio-from-open-source-community/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infoscraps.com/2009/02/09/a-better-alternative-to-microsoft-visual-studio-from-open-source-community/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 11:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Srinivasan A Paul Joseph</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDEs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips & Tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freewares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SharpDevelop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visual Studio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infoscraps.com/?p=72</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever wondered how you could live without the Microsoft Visual Studio for your .NET development and learn to live with its memory consumption that bogs you down every time you run it? Well, I do. And I always find the command-line runnable .NET Framework fascinating to develop a much lighter IDE than the Visual Studio. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever wondered how you could live without the Microsoft Visual Studio for your .NET development and learn to live with its memory consumption that bogs you down every time you run it? Well, I do. And I always find the command-line runnable .NET Framework fascinating to develop a much lighter IDE than the Visual Studio. And of course, the ever present question of Licensing costs for a product that is really not needed to develop in .NET Framework (I mean matter-of-factly).</p>
<p><span id="more-72"></span></p>
<p>Now, you can shed all your worries of that and embrace the open source community for making a powerful Open Source IDE named <a href="http://www.icsharpcode.net/OpenSource/SD/">SharpDevelop</a>. It was so powerful that you can seriously consider it for a complete drop-in replacement of Microsoft Visual Studio. It supports almost all of the Visual Studio features and much more. It supports Subversion for Version Control. In my opinion Subversion is far great an Version Control system than VSS. Here is the screen shot of how it looks:</p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.infoscraps.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/sharpdevelop-20090209163659.png" rel="shadowbox[post-72];player=img;"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-71" title="SharpDevelop from ic#code" src="http://www.infoscraps.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/sharpdevelop-20090209163659-300x230.png" alt="SharpDevelop from ic#code" width="300" height="230" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infoscraps.com/2009/02/09/a-better-alternative-to-microsoft-visual-studio-from-open-source-community/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazing Google Reader!</title>
		<link>http://www.infoscraps.com/2006/12/14/amazing-google-reader/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infoscraps.com/2006/12/14/amazing-google-reader/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Srinivasan A Paul Joseph</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Based]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Applications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infoscraps.com/?p=42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been using RSS Bandit for a long time now and I&#8217;ve never been very accustomed with Web Based readers. But recently one of my friend suggested Google Reader very much so I though I could do a try. First of all, Google Reader, didn&#8217;t accepted my OPML file which I exported from RSS Bandit. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.sripauljoseph.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/google-reader-logo.png" alt="Google Reader Logo" align="left" />I&#8217;ve been using <a href="http://www.rssbandit.org" target="_blank">RSS Bandit</a> for a long time now and I&#8217;ve never been very accustomed with Web Based readers. But recently one of my friend suggested Google Reader very much so I though I could do a try.</p>
<p><span id="more-42"></span></p>
<p>First of all, Google Reader, didn&#8217;t accepted my OPML file which I exported from RSS Bandit. So, I tried manually adding some of the RSS feeds and had a go. It&#8217;s really awesome. <img src='http://www.infoscraps.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Google seems to be making very good use of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AJAX" target="_blank">AJAX</a>. Which really made their Web Based reader a pleasant experience.</p>
<p>I strongly recommend those of you guys who think a Web Reader is not good to see <a href="http://www.google.com/reader/view/" target="_blank">Google Reader</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infoscraps.com/2006/12/14/amazing-google-reader/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
